Direct evidence is to be accepted at face value. That’ll teach me to post out of memory. A similar thing occured in renaissance florence, except it was shunned by the church, but engaged in anyway by late-marrying rich young men (in their 20s) with teenage boys, thus trying to delay the monogamous responsibilities of marriage. That being said, as a rule, a post needs to debunk some bad history, so if you want to post something like this, ping the mods first. The fact that that term did not exist doesn’t change the fact that there were in fact humans who had this biological state of being and it’s ridiculous to argue otherwise.
Nhs reviewing thousands of cervical cancer smear tests after women wrongly given all-clear
Hell, i’ve seen people try to claim john. However, that still doesn’t fly. This is what happens when you transition from a historical discussion to a queer issues discussion, i’m using the wrong word.